Article Details

Main Article Content

Mega Amelia Putri
Kumbara Kumbara

Subsidi input pertanian penting untuk pertanian berkelanjutan, mendorong penelitian untuk memahami dampaknya. Penelitian ini, dilakukan dengan metode tinjauan literatur sistematis dari artikel yang diterbitkan pada tahun 2014-2024, mengevaluasi efektivitas kebijakan subsidi dalam keberlanjutan pertanian melalui protokol PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses). Studi ini mensintesis temuan dari berbagai penelitian, menyoroti pentingnya kebijakan subsidi dalam membentuk dimensi ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan. Hasilnya menunjukkan beberapa dimensi signifikan, termasuk subsidi pupuk, asuransi tanaman, dan subsidi yang ditargetkan, yang memengaruhi produktivitas pertanian dan pelestarian lingkungan. Analisis ini mengungkapkan bahwa subsidi pupuk meningkatkan hasil panen, sementara asuransi tanaman yang disubsidi mengurangi risiko finansial bagi petani dan mendorong praktik manajemen risiko yang lebih baik. Subsidi yang ditargetkan mengatasi tantangan lokal dan mengurangi disparitas dalam pembangunan pedesaan. Penelitian masa depan harus fokus pada evaluasi jangka panjang subsidi ini, mengeksplorasi mekanisme kebijakan inovatif, dan menilai dampaknya terhadap sistem pertanian dan komunitas pedesaan. Pemahaman komprehensif ini berkontribusi pada pembuatan kebijakan berbasis bukti untuk pembangunan pertanian berkelanjutan, yang penting untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan komunitas petani. Wawasan dari studi ini mendukung program subsidi pertanian yang lebih berkelanjutan dan adil, yang menguntungkan petani, komunitas, dan lingkungan, sesuai dengan tujuan keberlanjutan global. Hal ini akan sangat membantu dalam mencapai target pembangunan yang telah ditetapkan oleh pemerintah.

Keywords: Keberlanjutan Kebijakan publik Subsidi pertanian Tinjauan literatur

Agbenyo, W., Jiang, Y., Jia, X., Wang, J., Ntim-Amo, G., Dunya, R., Siaw, A., Asare, I., & Twumasi, M. A. (2022). Does the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices impact farmers’ income? evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7).

Ajefu, J. B., Efobi, U., & Beecroft, I. (2021). Coping with negative shocks and the role of the farm input subsidy programme in rural Malawi. Environment and Development Economics, 26(5–6), 561–581.

Alam, M. R., & Gilbert, S. (2017). Monetary policy shocks and the dynamics of agricultural commodity prices: evidence from structural and factor-augmented VAR analyses. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 48(1), 15–27.

Ali, A., Rahut, D. B., & Imtiaz, M. (2019). Affordability linked with subsidy: impact of fertilizers subsidy on household welfare in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(19).

Arndt, C., Pauw, K., & Thurlow, J. (2016). The economy-wide impacts and risks of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(3), 962–980.

Azzam, A., Walters, C., & Kaus, T. (2021). Does subsidized crop insurance affect farm industry structure? lessons from the U.S. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(6), 1167–1180.

Bathla, S., Joshi, P. K., & Kumar, A. (2019). Targeting Agricultural Investments and Input Subsidies in Low-Income Lagging Regions of India. European Journal of Development Research, 31(5), 1197–1226.

Brunelle, T., Dumas, P., Souty, F., Dorin, B., & Nadaud, F. (2015). Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 46(5), 653–666.

Chen, L. J., Hu, S. W., Wang, V., Wen, J., & Ye, C. (2014). The effects of purchasing and price subsidy policies for agricultural products under target zones. Economic Modelling, 43, 439–447.

Coulibaly, A. D., & Savadogo, K. (2020). Does fertiliser subsidy increase maize productivity in Burkina Faso?. Development in Practice, 30(3), 283–296.

Ditjen PSP. (2023). Pedoman bantuan premi asuransi usaha tani padi 2023. Peraturan Kementrian Pertanian. Nomor, 09/KPTS/3R.210/B/11/2022.

Djibran, M. M., Andiani, P., Nurhasanah, D. P., & Mokoginta, M. M. (2023). Analisis pengembangan model pertanian berkelanjutan yang memperhatikan aspek sosial dan ekonomi di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, 2(10), 847-857.

Falatehan, A. F., Syaukat, Y., Hastuti, H., & Nasrullah, N. (2021). Paddy loss and its implication to fertilizer subsidy in Indonesia. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 28(1), 73-82.

Fitri, N. A., & Suryandari, K. C. (2024). Studi literatur: interpretasi kreativitas dan kerjasama melalui model pembelajaran scientific reading based project (SRBP). In social, humanities, and educational studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3).

Fu, H., Zhou, T., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2023). The impact of government subsidy and weather on environmentally sustainable investment decision for agricultural supply chain. PLoS ONE, 18(5 May), 1–22.

Frempong, R. B. (2023). Do subsidies on seed and fertilizer lead to child labour? Evidence from Malawi. Development Policy Review, 41(2), 1–23.

Fujimoto, T., & Suzuki, A. (2023). Do Fertilizer and Seed Subsidies Strengthen Farmers’ Market Participation? Evidence From Tanzania’s Subsidy Program. Review of Development Economics, 28(1), 339–359.

Gerber, A. (2016). Short-term success versus long-term failure: A simulation-based approach for understanding the potential of zambia’s fertilizer subsidy program in enhancing maize availability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(10).

Guo, L., Li, H., Cao, X., Cao, A., & Huang, M. (2021). Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Management, 299(August), 113621.

He, G., Feng, J., & Xiao, T. (2022). Effect of agricultural subsidies on heterogeneous farmers’ fertilizer application intensity and its mediating mechanism: Based on China household finance survey database. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(October), 1–13.

Karamba, R. W., & Winters, P. C. (2015). Gender and agricultural productivity: Implications of the Farm Input Subsidy Program in Malawi. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 46(3), 357–374.

Kilic, T., Whitney, E., & Winters, P. (2015). Decentralised beneficiary targeting in large-scale development programmes: Insights from the Malawi farm input subsidy programme. Journal of African Economies, 24(1), 26–56.

Liu, H. (2021). Finding the way out to African swine fever: analysis of chinese government’s subsidy programs to farms and consumers. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 160, 107543.

Mamun, A. (2024). Impact of farm subsidies on global agricultural productivity. Agricultural Economics, 55(2), 346–364.

Mason, N. M., Jayne, T. S., & Van De Walle, N. (2017). The political economy of fertilizer subsidy programs in Africa: evidence from Zambia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(3), 705–731.

Morgan, S. N., Mason, N. M., Levine, N. K., & Zulu-Mbata, O. (2019). Dis-incentivizing sustainable intensification? The case of Zambia’s maize-fertilizer subsidy program. World Development, 122, 54–69.

Nasrin, M., Bauer, S., & Arman, M. (2019). Dataset on measuring perception about fertilizer subsidy policy and factors behind differential farm level fertilizer usage in Bangladesh. Data in Brief, 22, 851–858.

Nkhoma, P. R., Bosman, M. M., & Eduful, M. (2019). Constituting Agricultural and Food Security Policy in Malawi: Exploring the Factors that Have Driven Policy Processes in the Farm Inputs Subsidy Programme. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(3), 360–375.

Nuhu, J. A., & Wale, E. (2023). How does participation in Ghana’s fertilizer subsidy program (GFSP) affect the adoption of sustainable intensification practices (SIPs) and gross farm inputs?. Development Studies Research, 10(1).

Putri, M. A., Taifur, W. D., & Bachtiar, N. (2023). Implementation Of Fertilizer Subsidies : Impact On Agriculture And Food Security In Indonesia ( A Critical Review ). Journal of Management, Accounting, General Finance and International Economic Issues (MARGINAL), 3(1), 272–286.

Rakshit, M. (2018). Some Economics of Fertiliser Subsidy. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 16, 209–228.

Sane, M., Hájek, M., Nwaogu, C., & Purwestri, R. C. (2021). Subsidy as an Economic Instrument for Environmental Protection: A Case of Global Fertilizer Use. Sustainability, 13(16), 9408.

Scholz, R. W., & Geissler, B. (2018). Feebates for dealing with trade-offs on fertilizer subsidies: A conceptual framework for environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 898–909.

Shelef, O., Stavi, I., Zdruli, P., & Rachmilevitch, S. (2016). Land use Change, a Case Study from Southern Italy: General Implications for Agricultural Subsidy Policies. Land Degradation and Development, 27(4), 868–870.

Skarżyńska, A., & Grochowska, R. (2020). Diversification of income parity among agricultural farms based on the Polish experience. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 21(4), 905–914.

Smędzik-Ambroży, K., & Guth, M. (2019). Common agricultural policy versus economic and environmental sustainability of agricultural farms in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 63(10), 86-95.

Takeshima, H., & Nkonya, E. (2014). Government fertilizer subsidy and commercial sector fertilizer demand: Evidence from the Federal Market Stabilization Program (FMSP) in Nigeria. Food Policy, 47, 1–12.

Tang, Y., Liao, H., Wu, Y., & Lei, G. (2024). Unravelling the bidirectional impact of Chinese agricultural subsidy policy on agricultural efficiency and farmers‘ income through panel data analysis. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 70(4), 165–177.

Theriault, V., & Smale, M. (2021). The unintended consequences of the fertilizer subsidy program on crop species diversity in Mali. Food Policy, 102, 102121.

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode systematic literature review untuk identifikasi platform dan metode pengembangan sistem informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63-77.

Vavřina, J., & Martinovičová, D. (2014). Economic performance of SME agricultural producers in the context of risk management: Focus on Visegrad 4 member countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(4), 777–782.

Vozárová, I. K., Kotulič, R., & Vavrek, R. (2020). Assessing impacts of CAP subsidies on financial performance of enterprises in Slovak Republic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3).

Walls, H. L., Johnston, D., Tak, M., Dixon, J., Hanefeld, J., Hull, E., & Smith, R. D. (2018). The impact of agricultural input subsidies on food and nutrition security: a systematic review. Food Security, 10(6), 1425–1436.

Wu, Z., Feng, X., Zhang, Y., & Fan, S. (2024). Repositioning fertilizer manufacturing subsidies for improving food security and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(2), 430–443.

Xin, Y., Xu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). A Study on Green Agricultural Production Decision-Making by Agricultural Cooperatives under Government Subsidies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3).

Xu, W., Zhao, Q., Fan, S., & Zhu, C. (2023). Effect of direct grain subsidies on food consumption of rural residents in China. AgEcon Search, 18.

Xue, W., & Xu, Z. (2023). The Impacts of Government subsidies and consumer preferences on food supply chain traceability under different power structures. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1).

Yang, Q., Zhang, P., Li, Y., Ning, J., & Chu, N. (2023). Does the policy of decoupled subsidies improve the agricultural economic resilience?—evidence from China’s main corn producing regions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13).

Yi, F., Sun, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security—Impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China. Food Policy, 50, 114-124.

Ziliaskopoulos, K., & Papalamprou, K. (2022). A bilevel linear programming model for developing a subsidy policy to minimize the environmental impact of the agricultural sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13).

Zubor-Nemes, A., & Toth, J. (2020). Spatial and temporal development of subsidised crop insurance in Hungary. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 21(1), 176–186.

Received: 23 Mar 2024; Accepted: 26 Nov 2024; Available Online: 02 Dec 2024;